4.6: groundid | Kristine Snodgrass–visual art (digital glitches)

burnish
digital glitch
565 x 750 pixels
©2021

groundidblue
digital glitch
562 x 750 pixels
©2021

groundid
digital glitch
562 x 750 pixels
©2021

northern
digital glitch
562 x 750 pixels
©2021

pinkfold
digital glitch
750 x 711 pixels
©2021

pinkfold1
digital glitch
750 x 711 pixels
©2021

pinkfold2
digital glitch
750 x 711 pixels
©2021

pinkground
digital glitch
750 x 562 pixels
©2021

pinktit
digital glitch
559 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluetitsquared
digital glitch
559 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluetit1
digital glitch
559 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluetit3
digital glitch
559 x 750 pixels
©2021

grassfold
digital glitch
750 x 619 pixels
©2021

cylunder
digital glitch
562 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluec6
digital glitch
509 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluec8
digital glitch
500 x 781 pixels
©2021

bluec14
digital glitch
530 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluec15
digital glitch
500 x 754 pixels
©2021

bluec16
digital glitch
523 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluecigar
digital glitch
562 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluecigar1.4
digital glitch
677 x 750 pixels
©2021

bluecigar2.1
digital glitch
667 x 750 pixels
©2021

blueface
digital glitch
739 x 750 pixels
©2021

voice
digital glitch
511 x 750 pixels
©2021
ARTIST STATEMENT: FEMMEGLITCH
Intuitive. Sign. Deletion. Obliteration. Constructive. Beauty
These pieces are glitches (digital) using three different subjects or topics that are all interrelated: t-shirts appearing in social media ads, images of the sound of my voice, and images of my body. My work concerns the intersections of sexuality, voyeurism, performance, Capitalism, and gender more broadly. I am influenced by asemics and abstract expressionist women like Joan Mitchell and Helen Frankenthaler.
The glitch is not the environment of the thing, it is the thing itself. I am less interested in exhausting the definitions of asemic writing (if the glitch is ultimately denying meaning from a semantic form is arguable) and more interested in seeing the possibilities of the glitch. I wrangle the “data bending” on phone apps until I get the desired image. That is creative and productive. This does not impede, however, the obliteration of the original image.
Most of my glitches start with ads on my Facebook (on my phone) that offer new complexities when considering its form. I am now introducing Capitalism, data mining, privacy infringement, assumption, targeting, and an inextricable combination of those that can only begin to attack the implications of a thing. I screenshot the ads for t-shirts that appear in my feed (based on the above) that usually show “positive” messaging for and about women, or perceived “feminist” messaging. Glitch apps then layer, destroy, and rebuild what I have consumed. Then I can resist or subvert by taking ownership of the whole mess. I make it what I want it to look like.
I use glitches to break down patriarchal structures. I think of the glitch as a sex act. It is a dominant/submissive binary. There is intention in glitching that is beauty. We know it is not ugly. The ultimate infringement of the digital—our human mistake of knowing and understanding.
Femmeglitch: I have used this moniker or description that includes gender. I think identifying the gender in the act is claiming the social and cultural implications of oppressive systems and the glitching is bending those systems, often to their demise. This makes glitching an art form.

self-portrait
©2020